The relationship between spoken language and speech and nonspeech processing in children with autism: a magnetic event-related field study

Shu Hui Yau, Jon Brock, Genevieve McArthur

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

It has been proposed that language impairments in children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) stem from atypical neural processing of speech and/or nonspeech sounds. However, the strength of this proposal is compromised by the unreliable outcomes of previous studies of speech and nonspeech processing in ASD. The aim of this study was to determine whether there was an association between poor spoken language and atypical event-related field (ERF) responses to speech and nonspeech sounds in children with ASD (n = 14) and controls (n = 18). Data from this developmental population (ages 6-14) were analysed using a novel combination of methods to maximize the reliability of our findings while taking into consideration the heterogeneity of the ASD population. The results showed that poor spoken language scores were associated with atypical left hemisphere brain responses (200 to 400 ms) to both speech and nonspeech in the ASD group. These data support the idea that some children with ASD may have an immature auditory cortex that affects their ability to process both speech and nonspeech sounds. Their poor speech processing may impair their ability to process the speech of other people, and hence reduce their ability to learn the phonology, syntax, and semantics of their native language.

Original languageEnglish
JournalDevelopmental Science
VolumeEarly view
Early online date4 May 2016
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 4 May 2016

Bibliographical note

-

Keywords

  • magnetoencephalography (MEG)
  • autism spectrum disorders
  • Autism
  • auditory processing
  • language impairment
  • Speech perception

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The relationship between spoken language and speech and nonspeech processing in children with autism: a magnetic event-related field study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this