The snakes and ladders of user involvement: moving beyond Arnstein

Jonathan Q. Tritter, Alison McCallum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

For 35 years, Arnstein's ladder of citizen participation has been a touchstone for policy makers and practitioners promoting user involvement. This article critically assesses Arnstein's writing in relation to user involvement in health drawing on evidence from the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Finland, Sweden and Canada. Arnstein's model, however, by solely emphasizing power, limits effective responses to the challenge of involving users in services and undermines the potential of the user involvement process. Such an emphasis on power assumes that it has a common basis for users, providers and policymakers and ignores the existence of different relevant forms of knowledge and expertise. It also fails to recognise that for some users, participation itself may be a goal. We propose a new model to replace the static image of a ladder and argue that for user involvement to improve health services it must acknowledge the value of the process and the diversity of knowledge and experience of both health professionals and lay people.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)156-168
Number of pages13
JournalHealth Policy
Volume76
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2006

Fingerprint

Snakes
Health
Finland
Administrative Personnel
Sweden
Netherlands
Health Services
Canada
United Kingdom

Keywords

  • user involvement
  • patient participation
  • patient empowerment
  • citizen engagement
  • expert patient
  • health service reform

Cite this

@article{540adde7c15f489a9de97edefdc874d1,
title = "The snakes and ladders of user involvement: moving beyond Arnstein",
abstract = "For 35 years, Arnstein's ladder of citizen participation has been a touchstone for policy makers and practitioners promoting user involvement. This article critically assesses Arnstein's writing in relation to user involvement in health drawing on evidence from the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Finland, Sweden and Canada. Arnstein's model, however, by solely emphasizing power, limits effective responses to the challenge of involving users in services and undermines the potential of the user involvement process. Such an emphasis on power assumes that it has a common basis for users, providers and policymakers and ignores the existence of different relevant forms of knowledge and expertise. It also fails to recognise that for some users, participation itself may be a goal. We propose a new model to replace the static image of a ladder and argue that for user involvement to improve health services it must acknowledge the value of the process and the diversity of knowledge and experience of both health professionals and lay people.",
keywords = "user involvement, patient participation, patient empowerment, citizen engagement, expert patient, health service reform",
author = "Tritter, {Jonathan Q.} and Alison McCallum",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.05.008",
language = "English",
volume = "76",
pages = "156--168",
journal = "Health Policy",
issn = "0168-8510",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

The snakes and ladders of user involvement : moving beyond Arnstein. / Tritter, Jonathan Q.; McCallum, Alison.

In: Health Policy, Vol. 76, No. 2, 01.04.2006, p. 156-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The snakes and ladders of user involvement

T2 - moving beyond Arnstein

AU - Tritter, Jonathan Q.

AU - McCallum, Alison

PY - 2006/4/1

Y1 - 2006/4/1

N2 - For 35 years, Arnstein's ladder of citizen participation has been a touchstone for policy makers and practitioners promoting user involvement. This article critically assesses Arnstein's writing in relation to user involvement in health drawing on evidence from the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Finland, Sweden and Canada. Arnstein's model, however, by solely emphasizing power, limits effective responses to the challenge of involving users in services and undermines the potential of the user involvement process. Such an emphasis on power assumes that it has a common basis for users, providers and policymakers and ignores the existence of different relevant forms of knowledge and expertise. It also fails to recognise that for some users, participation itself may be a goal. We propose a new model to replace the static image of a ladder and argue that for user involvement to improve health services it must acknowledge the value of the process and the diversity of knowledge and experience of both health professionals and lay people.

AB - For 35 years, Arnstein's ladder of citizen participation has been a touchstone for policy makers and practitioners promoting user involvement. This article critically assesses Arnstein's writing in relation to user involvement in health drawing on evidence from the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Finland, Sweden and Canada. Arnstein's model, however, by solely emphasizing power, limits effective responses to the challenge of involving users in services and undermines the potential of the user involvement process. Such an emphasis on power assumes that it has a common basis for users, providers and policymakers and ignores the existence of different relevant forms of knowledge and expertise. It also fails to recognise that for some users, participation itself may be a goal. We propose a new model to replace the static image of a ladder and argue that for user involvement to improve health services it must acknowledge the value of the process and the diversity of knowledge and experience of both health professionals and lay people.

KW - user involvement

KW - patient participation

KW - patient empowerment

KW - citizen engagement

KW - expert patient

KW - health service reform

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644701044&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.05.008

DO - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.05.008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33644701044

VL - 76

SP - 156

EP - 168

JO - Health Policy

JF - Health Policy

SN - 0168-8510

IS - 2

ER -