The two limits debates: "Limits to Growth" and climate change

Joshua Eastin, Reiner Grundmann, Aseem Prakash

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In this article we compare the current debate about global warming with the earlier discourse of Limits to Growth (LtG) of the 1970's. We are especially interested in the similarities of and differences between the two cases and therefore compare the policy challenges and lessons to be drawn. While the two debates differ on important issues, they share a technocratic orientation to public policy, and susceptibility to similar pitfalls. In both debates alarming scenarios about future catastrophes play an important role. We suggest that climate change policy discourse needs to focus more closely on the social, economic, and political dimensions of climate change, as opposed to its excessive emphasis on emission reduction targets. We also argue that an excessive faith in the market mechanisms to supply global warming mitigation technologies is problematic. In this respect, we provide a reality check regarding the political implications of emission targets and timetables and suggest how policy issues can be moved forward.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)16-26
Number of pages11
JournalFutures
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2011

Fingerprint

climate change
market mechanism
discourse
social economics
faith
global warming
public policy
scenario
mitigation
market
policy
Global warming
Climate change
Discourse
Limits to growth
economics
Public policy
Climate change policy
Catastrophe
Market mechanism

Keywords

  • global warming
  • Limits to Growth
  • public policy
  • climate change
  • emission reduction targets
  • supply global warming mitigation technologies
  • emission targets

Cite this

Eastin, Joshua ; Grundmann, Reiner ; Prakash, Aseem. / The two limits debates: "Limits to Growth" and climate change. In: Futures. 2011 ; Vol. 43, No. 1. pp. 16-26.
@article{b8080242db12452391563b646390a83d,
title = "The two limits debates: {"}Limits to Growth{"} and climate change",
abstract = "In this article we compare the current debate about global warming with the earlier discourse of Limits to Growth (LtG) of the 1970's. We are especially interested in the similarities of and differences between the two cases and therefore compare the policy challenges and lessons to be drawn. While the two debates differ on important issues, they share a technocratic orientation to public policy, and susceptibility to similar pitfalls. In both debates alarming scenarios about future catastrophes play an important role. We suggest that climate change policy discourse needs to focus more closely on the social, economic, and political dimensions of climate change, as opposed to its excessive emphasis on emission reduction targets. We also argue that an excessive faith in the market mechanisms to supply global warming mitigation technologies is problematic. In this respect, we provide a reality check regarding the political implications of emission targets and timetables and suggest how policy issues can be moved forward.",
keywords = "global warming, Limits to Growth, public policy, climate change, emission reduction targets, supply global warming mitigation technologies, emission targets",
author = "Joshua Eastin and Reiner Grundmann and Aseem Prakash",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.futures.2010.03.001",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "16--26",
journal = "Futures",
issn = "1873-6378",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Eastin, J, Grundmann, R & Prakash, A 2011, 'The two limits debates: "Limits to Growth" and climate change', Futures, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 16-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2010.03.001

The two limits debates: "Limits to Growth" and climate change. / Eastin, Joshua; Grundmann, Reiner; Prakash, Aseem.

In: Futures, Vol. 43, No. 1, 02.2011, p. 16-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The two limits debates: "Limits to Growth" and climate change

AU - Eastin, Joshua

AU - Grundmann, Reiner

AU - Prakash, Aseem

PY - 2011/2

Y1 - 2011/2

N2 - In this article we compare the current debate about global warming with the earlier discourse of Limits to Growth (LtG) of the 1970's. We are especially interested in the similarities of and differences between the two cases and therefore compare the policy challenges and lessons to be drawn. While the two debates differ on important issues, they share a technocratic orientation to public policy, and susceptibility to similar pitfalls. In both debates alarming scenarios about future catastrophes play an important role. We suggest that climate change policy discourse needs to focus more closely on the social, economic, and political dimensions of climate change, as opposed to its excessive emphasis on emission reduction targets. We also argue that an excessive faith in the market mechanisms to supply global warming mitigation technologies is problematic. In this respect, we provide a reality check regarding the political implications of emission targets and timetables and suggest how policy issues can be moved forward.

AB - In this article we compare the current debate about global warming with the earlier discourse of Limits to Growth (LtG) of the 1970's. We are especially interested in the similarities of and differences between the two cases and therefore compare the policy challenges and lessons to be drawn. While the two debates differ on important issues, they share a technocratic orientation to public policy, and susceptibility to similar pitfalls. In both debates alarming scenarios about future catastrophes play an important role. We suggest that climate change policy discourse needs to focus more closely on the social, economic, and political dimensions of climate change, as opposed to its excessive emphasis on emission reduction targets. We also argue that an excessive faith in the market mechanisms to supply global warming mitigation technologies is problematic. In this respect, we provide a reality check regarding the political implications of emission targets and timetables and suggest how policy issues can be moved forward.

KW - global warming

KW - Limits to Growth

KW - public policy

KW - climate change

KW - emission reduction targets

KW - supply global warming mitigation technologies

KW - emission targets

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650987479&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328710000352?via%3Dihub

U2 - 10.1016/j.futures.2010.03.001

DO - 10.1016/j.futures.2010.03.001

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 16

EP - 26

JO - Futures

JF - Futures

SN - 1873-6378

IS - 1

ER -