Towards a semiology of the periodic review of UK regulated utilities

Stuart M. Cooper, David Crowther, Chris Carter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This note explores the regulatory process of UK privatised utilities through the periodic review of prices. It provides a brief history of the privatisation programme in the UK and the theoretical arguments for the price-cap regulation that has been used. It argues that regulatory process appears to involve a covert dialogue and exchange of information between the regulator and regulated and also a second separate review process that consists of an overt dialogue. Using a semiotic analysis the authors suggest that the unfolding of each of these overt reviews follows a very similar pattern that is constantly being re-enacted. It is concluded that further research is required into the relative importance of the two separate review processes in the setting of the price-cap.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)291-297
Number of pages7
JournalFinancial Accountability and Management
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2001

Fingerprint

Review process
Periodic review
Privatization
Price cap regulation
Price caps
Relative importance

Bibliographical note

The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com

Keywords

  • privatixation
  • utility industries
  • price-cap regulation
  • semiology
  • UK

Cite this

Cooper, Stuart M. ; Crowther, David ; Carter, Chris. / Towards a semiology of the periodic review of UK regulated utilities. In: Financial Accountability and Management. 2001 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 291-297.
@article{f3449c84c2e2416d89aa60fc92d0b09e,
title = "Towards a semiology of the periodic review of UK regulated utilities",
abstract = "This note explores the regulatory process of UK privatised utilities through the periodic review of prices. It provides a brief history of the privatisation programme in the UK and the theoretical arguments for the price-cap regulation that has been used. It argues that regulatory process appears to involve a covert dialogue and exchange of information between the regulator and regulated and also a second separate review process that consists of an overt dialogue. Using a semiotic analysis the authors suggest that the unfolding of each of these overt reviews follows a very similar pattern that is constantly being re-enacted. It is concluded that further research is required into the relative importance of the two separate review processes in the setting of the price-cap.",
keywords = "privatixation, utility industries, price-cap regulation, semiology, UK",
author = "Cooper, {Stuart M.} and David Crowther and Chris Carter",
note = "The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com",
year = "2001",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/1468-0408.00132",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "291--297",
journal = "Financial Accountability and Management",
issn = "0267-4424",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Towards a semiology of the periodic review of UK regulated utilities. / Cooper, Stuart M.; Crowther, David; Carter, Chris.

In: Financial Accountability and Management, Vol. 17, No. 3, 08.2001, p. 291-297.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards a semiology of the periodic review of UK regulated utilities

AU - Cooper, Stuart M.

AU - Crowther, David

AU - Carter, Chris

N1 - The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com

PY - 2001/8

Y1 - 2001/8

N2 - This note explores the regulatory process of UK privatised utilities through the periodic review of prices. It provides a brief history of the privatisation programme in the UK and the theoretical arguments for the price-cap regulation that has been used. It argues that regulatory process appears to involve a covert dialogue and exchange of information between the regulator and regulated and also a second separate review process that consists of an overt dialogue. Using a semiotic analysis the authors suggest that the unfolding of each of these overt reviews follows a very similar pattern that is constantly being re-enacted. It is concluded that further research is required into the relative importance of the two separate review processes in the setting of the price-cap.

AB - This note explores the regulatory process of UK privatised utilities through the periodic review of prices. It provides a brief history of the privatisation programme in the UK and the theoretical arguments for the price-cap regulation that has been used. It argues that regulatory process appears to involve a covert dialogue and exchange of information between the regulator and regulated and also a second separate review process that consists of an overt dialogue. Using a semiotic analysis the authors suggest that the unfolding of each of these overt reviews follows a very similar pattern that is constantly being re-enacted. It is concluded that further research is required into the relative importance of the two separate review processes in the setting of the price-cap.

KW - privatixation

KW - utility industries

KW - price-cap regulation

KW - semiology

KW - UK

UR - http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118975602/abstract

U2 - 10.1111/1468-0408.00132

DO - 10.1111/1468-0408.00132

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 291

EP - 297

JO - Financial Accountability and Management

JF - Financial Accountability and Management

SN - 0267-4424

IS - 3

ER -