(Un)Doing Constitutionalism: The Cases of Liu Xiaobo and Xu Zhiyong

Hermann Aubié, Xinhong Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Based on the cases of Liu Xiaobo and Xu Zhiyong, this article reviews the Court judgments and discussions about the criminal charges of “inciting subversion of state power” and “disrupting public order” used against Liu Xiaobo and Xu Zhiyong respectively. Through a review of the discourses of Chinese legal scholars surrounding the two cases, we focus on the conflicting arguments regarding the Chinese Constitution and the Constitutional right to freedom of expression. This article concludes with an analysis of the political meaning of the two cases by revisiting the debate about the implementation of a Constitutional review and by reflecting upon the political contention between the government’s recent re-ideologisation of the Constitution and the growing calls of Chinese citizens who advocate Constitutionalism as a proxy for political reform.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)377-393
Number of pages16
JournalAsian Studies Review
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jul 2016

Fingerprint

constitutionalism
constitution
judgment or sentence
charge
political reform
subversion
citizen
discourse
Constitution
Constitutionalism
Subversion
State Power
Government
Freedom of Speech
Political Reform
Public Order
Discourse

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Asian Studies Review on 24 July 2016, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/10357823.2016.1194806

Cite this

Aubié, Hermann ; Wang, Xinhong. / (Un)Doing Constitutionalism: The Cases of Liu Xiaobo and Xu Zhiyong. In: Asian Studies Review. 2016 ; Vol. 40, No. 3. pp. 377-393.
@article{ae771c3782c54db9b1528e9d680f31f6,
title = "(Un)Doing Constitutionalism: The Cases of Liu Xiaobo and Xu Zhiyong",
abstract = "Based on the cases of Liu Xiaobo and Xu Zhiyong, this article reviews the Court judgments and discussions about the criminal charges of “inciting subversion of state power” and “disrupting public order” used against Liu Xiaobo and Xu Zhiyong respectively. Through a review of the discourses of Chinese legal scholars surrounding the two cases, we focus on the conflicting arguments regarding the Chinese Constitution and the Constitutional right to freedom of expression. This article concludes with an analysis of the political meaning of the two cases by revisiting the debate about the implementation of a Constitutional review and by reflecting upon the political contention between the government’s recent re-ideologisation of the Constitution and the growing calls of Chinese citizens who advocate Constitutionalism as a proxy for political reform.",
author = "Hermann Aubi{\'e} and Xinhong Wang",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Asian Studies Review on 24 July 2016, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/10357823.2016.1194806",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/10357823.2016.1194806",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "377--393",
number = "3",

}

(Un)Doing Constitutionalism: The Cases of Liu Xiaobo and Xu Zhiyong. / Aubié, Hermann; Wang, Xinhong.

In: Asian Studies Review, Vol. 40, No. 3, 02.07.2016, p. 377-393.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - (Un)Doing Constitutionalism: The Cases of Liu Xiaobo and Xu Zhiyong

AU - Aubié, Hermann

AU - Wang, Xinhong

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Asian Studies Review on 24 July 2016, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/10357823.2016.1194806

PY - 2016/7/2

Y1 - 2016/7/2

N2 - Based on the cases of Liu Xiaobo and Xu Zhiyong, this article reviews the Court judgments and discussions about the criminal charges of “inciting subversion of state power” and “disrupting public order” used against Liu Xiaobo and Xu Zhiyong respectively. Through a review of the discourses of Chinese legal scholars surrounding the two cases, we focus on the conflicting arguments regarding the Chinese Constitution and the Constitutional right to freedom of expression. This article concludes with an analysis of the political meaning of the two cases by revisiting the debate about the implementation of a Constitutional review and by reflecting upon the political contention between the government’s recent re-ideologisation of the Constitution and the growing calls of Chinese citizens who advocate Constitutionalism as a proxy for political reform.

AB - Based on the cases of Liu Xiaobo and Xu Zhiyong, this article reviews the Court judgments and discussions about the criminal charges of “inciting subversion of state power” and “disrupting public order” used against Liu Xiaobo and Xu Zhiyong respectively. Through a review of the discourses of Chinese legal scholars surrounding the two cases, we focus on the conflicting arguments regarding the Chinese Constitution and the Constitutional right to freedom of expression. This article concludes with an analysis of the political meaning of the two cases by revisiting the debate about the implementation of a Constitutional review and by reflecting upon the political contention between the government’s recent re-ideologisation of the Constitution and the growing calls of Chinese citizens who advocate Constitutionalism as a proxy for political reform.

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10357823.2016.1194806

U2 - 10.1080/10357823.2016.1194806

DO - 10.1080/10357823.2016.1194806

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 377

EP - 393

IS - 3

ER -