Who says what to whom? Alignments and arguments in EU policy-making

Rainer Eising*, Daniel Rasch, Patrycja Rozbicka, Danica Fink-Hafner, Mitja Hafner-Fink, Meta Novak

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the EU multilevel polity, domestic interest groups seek to shape EU legislation by accessing both national and EU institutions. Previous studies indicated that institutional and issue contexts, as well as organizational characteristics shape their strategies of interest representation. However, we know much less about how alignments and arguments impact on their participation in EU and national policy consultations. Addressing this gap, we investigate the lobbying strategies of almost 2,900 national interest organizations from five member states (Germany, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Sweden, and the United Kingdom) on 20 EU directive proposals bringing also a new empirical scope to the study of multilevel interest representation. The findings indicate that alignments and arguments shape the participation of domestic interest groups in consultations on EU policies. We infer from our study that some general predictions of interest group behaviour are overstretched and outline four variations of interest representation routines.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)957-980
JournalWest European Politics
Volume40
Issue number5
Early online date26 May 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

EU policy
EU
representation of interests
interest group
participation
Slovenia
Sweden
Netherlands
legislation

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in West European Politics on 26/05/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/01402382.2017.1320175

Keywords

  • multi-level governance
  • national interest groups
  • alignments
  • arguments
  • strategies

Cite this

Eising, Rainer ; Rasch, Daniel ; Rozbicka, Patrycja ; Fink-Hafner, Danica ; Hafner-Fink, Mitja ; Novak, Meta. / Who says what to whom? Alignments and arguments in EU policy-making. In: West European Politics. 2017 ; Vol. 40, No. 5. pp. 957-980.
@article{516000a7c7164b30b74258cc01515199,
title = "Who says what to whom? Alignments and arguments in EU policy-making",
abstract = "In the EU multilevel polity, domestic interest groups seek to shape EU legislation by accessing both national and EU institutions. Previous studies indicated that institutional and issue contexts, as well as organizational characteristics shape their strategies of interest representation. However, we know much less about how alignments and arguments impact on their participation in EU and national policy consultations. Addressing this gap, we investigate the lobbying strategies of almost 2,900 national interest organizations from five member states (Germany, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Sweden, and the United Kingdom) on 20 EU directive proposals bringing also a new empirical scope to the study of multilevel interest representation. The findings indicate that alignments and arguments shape the participation of domestic interest groups in consultations on EU policies. We infer from our study that some general predictions of interest group behaviour are overstretched and outline four variations of interest representation routines.",
keywords = "multi-level governance, national interest groups, alignments, arguments, strategies",
author = "Rainer Eising and Daniel Rasch and Patrycja Rozbicka and Danica Fink-Hafner and Mitja Hafner-Fink and Meta Novak",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in West European Politics on 26/05/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/01402382.2017.1320175",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/01402382.2017.1320175",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "957--980",
journal = "West European Politics",
issn = "0140-2382",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "5",

}

Eising, R, Rasch, D, Rozbicka, P, Fink-Hafner, D, Hafner-Fink, M & Novak, M 2017, 'Who says what to whom? Alignments and arguments in EU policy-making', West European Politics, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 957-980. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1320175

Who says what to whom? Alignments and arguments in EU policy-making. / Eising, Rainer; Rasch, Daniel; Rozbicka, Patrycja; Fink-Hafner, Danica; Hafner-Fink, Mitja; Novak, Meta.

In: West European Politics, Vol. 40, No. 5, 2017, p. 957-980.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Who says what to whom? Alignments and arguments in EU policy-making

AU - Eising, Rainer

AU - Rasch, Daniel

AU - Rozbicka, Patrycja

AU - Fink-Hafner, Danica

AU - Hafner-Fink, Mitja

AU - Novak, Meta

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in West European Politics on 26/05/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/01402382.2017.1320175

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - In the EU multilevel polity, domestic interest groups seek to shape EU legislation by accessing both national and EU institutions. Previous studies indicated that institutional and issue contexts, as well as organizational characteristics shape their strategies of interest representation. However, we know much less about how alignments and arguments impact on their participation in EU and national policy consultations. Addressing this gap, we investigate the lobbying strategies of almost 2,900 national interest organizations from five member states (Germany, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Sweden, and the United Kingdom) on 20 EU directive proposals bringing also a new empirical scope to the study of multilevel interest representation. The findings indicate that alignments and arguments shape the participation of domestic interest groups in consultations on EU policies. We infer from our study that some general predictions of interest group behaviour are overstretched and outline four variations of interest representation routines.

AB - In the EU multilevel polity, domestic interest groups seek to shape EU legislation by accessing both national and EU institutions. Previous studies indicated that institutional and issue contexts, as well as organizational characteristics shape their strategies of interest representation. However, we know much less about how alignments and arguments impact on their participation in EU and national policy consultations. Addressing this gap, we investigate the lobbying strategies of almost 2,900 national interest organizations from five member states (Germany, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Sweden, and the United Kingdom) on 20 EU directive proposals bringing also a new empirical scope to the study of multilevel interest representation. The findings indicate that alignments and arguments shape the participation of domestic interest groups in consultations on EU policies. We infer from our study that some general predictions of interest group behaviour are overstretched and outline four variations of interest representation routines.

KW - multi-level governance

KW - national interest groups

KW - alignments

KW - arguments

KW - strategies

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/01402382.2017.1320175

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019717402&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01402382.2017.1320175

DO - 10.1080/01402382.2017.1320175

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85019717402

VL - 40

SP - 957

EP - 980

JO - West European Politics

JF - West European Politics

SN - 0140-2382

IS - 5

ER -