Breaking down barriers: teenage girls’ perceptions of engineering as a study and career choice

Jane Andrews*, Robin Clark

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Background: Stereotypically perceived to be an ‘all male’ occupation, engineering has for many years failed to attract high numbers of young women [1,2]. The reasons for this are varied, but tend to focus on misconceptions of the profession as being more suitable for men. In seeking to investigate this issue a participatory research approach was adopted [3] in which two 17 year-old female high school students interviewed twenty high school girls. Questions focused on the girls’ perceptions of engineering as a study and career choice. The findings were recorded and analysed using qualitative techniques. The study identified three distinctive ‘influences’ as being pivotal to girls’ perceptions of engineering; pedagogical; social; and, familial.
Pedagogical Influences: Pedagogical influences tended to focus on science and maths. In discussing science, the majority of the girls identified biology and chemistry as more ‘realistic’ whilst physics was perceived to more suitable for boys. The personality of the teacher, and how a particular subject is taught, proved to be important influences shaping opinions.
Social Influences: Societal influences were reflected in the girls’ career choice with the majority considering medical or social science related careers. Although all of the girls believed engineering to be ‘male dominated’, none believed that a woman should not be engineer.
Familial Influences: Parental influence was identified as key to career and study choice; only two of the girls had discussed engineering with their parents of which only one was being actively encouraged to pursue a career in engineering.
Discussion: The study found that one of the most significant barriers to engineering is a lack of awareness. Engineering did not register in the girls’ lives, it was not taught in school, and only one had met a female engineer. Building on the study findings, the discussion considers how engineering could be made more attractive to young women. Whilst misconceptions about what an engineer is need to be addressed, other more fundamental pedagogical barriers, such as the need to make physics more attractive to girls and the need to develop the curriculum so as to meet the learning needs of 21st Century students are discussed.
By drawing attention to the issues around gender and the barriers to engineering, this paper contributes to current debates in this area – in doing so it provides food for thought about policy and practice in engineering and engineering education.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSEFI 40th annual conference
Place of PublicationBrussels (BE)
PublisherSociété Eropéenne pour la Formation des Ingénieurs
Number of pages8
ISBN (Electronic)978-2-87352-005-2
ISBN (Print)9782873520052
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2012
EventSEFI 40th annual conference - Thessaloniki, Greece
Duration: 23 Sep 201226 Sep 2012

Conference

ConferenceSEFI 40th annual conference
CountryGreece
CityThessaloniki
Period23/09/1226/09/12

Fingerprint

career
engineering
engineer
physics
girls' school
research approach
science
school
biology
personality
occupation
parents
chemistry
student
social science
profession
curriculum
lack
gender
teacher

Keywords

  • girls
  • engineering
  • barriers
  • gender

Cite this

Andrews, J., & Clark, R. (2012). Breaking down barriers: teenage girls’ perceptions of engineering as a study and career choice. In SEFI 40th annual conference Brussels (BE): Société Eropéenne pour la Formation des Ingénieurs.
Andrews, Jane ; Clark, Robin. / Breaking down barriers : teenage girls’ perceptions of engineering as a study and career choice. SEFI 40th annual conference. Brussels (BE) : Société Eropéenne pour la Formation des Ingénieurs, 2012.
@inproceedings{96abaccde4c345a09622a2597daa3737,
title = "Breaking down barriers: teenage girls’ perceptions of engineering as a study and career choice",
abstract = "Background: Stereotypically perceived to be an ‘all male’ occupation, engineering has for many years failed to attract high numbers of young women [1,2]. The reasons for this are varied, but tend to focus on misconceptions of the profession as being more suitable for men. In seeking to investigate this issue a participatory research approach was adopted [3] in which two 17 year-old female high school students interviewed twenty high school girls. Questions focused on the girls’ perceptions of engineering as a study and career choice. The findings were recorded and analysed using qualitative techniques. The study identified three distinctive ‘influences’ as being pivotal to girls’ perceptions of engineering; pedagogical; social; and, familial.Pedagogical Influences: Pedagogical influences tended to focus on science and maths. In discussing science, the majority of the girls identified biology and chemistry as more ‘realistic’ whilst physics was perceived to more suitable for boys. The personality of the teacher, and how a particular subject is taught, proved to be important influences shaping opinions.Social Influences: Societal influences were reflected in the girls’ career choice with the majority considering medical or social science related careers. Although all of the girls believed engineering to be ‘male dominated’, none believed that a woman should not be engineer.Familial Influences: Parental influence was identified as key to career and study choice; only two of the girls had discussed engineering with their parents of which only one was being actively encouraged to pursue a career in engineering.Discussion: The study found that one of the most significant barriers to engineering is a lack of awareness. Engineering did not register in the girls’ lives, it was not taught in school, and only one had met a female engineer. Building on the study findings, the discussion considers how engineering could be made more attractive to young women. Whilst misconceptions about what an engineer is need to be addressed, other more fundamental pedagogical barriers, such as the need to make physics more attractive to girls and the need to develop the curriculum so as to meet the learning needs of 21st Century students are discussed.By drawing attention to the issues around gender and the barriers to engineering, this paper contributes to current debates in this area – in doing so it provides food for thought about policy and practice in engineering and engineering education.",
keywords = "girls, engineering, barriers, gender",
author = "Jane Andrews and Robin Clark",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
language = "English",
isbn = "9782873520052",
booktitle = "SEFI 40th annual conference",
publisher = "Soci{\'e}t{\'e} Erop{\'e}enne pour la Formation des Ing{\'e}nieurs",

}

Andrews, J & Clark, R 2012, Breaking down barriers: teenage girls’ perceptions of engineering as a study and career choice. in SEFI 40th annual conference. Société Eropéenne pour la Formation des Ingénieurs, Brussels (BE), SEFI 40th annual conference, Thessaloniki, Greece, 23/09/12.

Breaking down barriers : teenage girls’ perceptions of engineering as a study and career choice. / Andrews, Jane; Clark, Robin.

SEFI 40th annual conference. Brussels (BE) : Société Eropéenne pour la Formation des Ingénieurs, 2012.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Breaking down barriers

T2 - teenage girls’ perceptions of engineering as a study and career choice

AU - Andrews, Jane

AU - Clark, Robin

PY - 2012/9

Y1 - 2012/9

N2 - Background: Stereotypically perceived to be an ‘all male’ occupation, engineering has for many years failed to attract high numbers of young women [1,2]. The reasons for this are varied, but tend to focus on misconceptions of the profession as being more suitable for men. In seeking to investigate this issue a participatory research approach was adopted [3] in which two 17 year-old female high school students interviewed twenty high school girls. Questions focused on the girls’ perceptions of engineering as a study and career choice. The findings were recorded and analysed using qualitative techniques. The study identified three distinctive ‘influences’ as being pivotal to girls’ perceptions of engineering; pedagogical; social; and, familial.Pedagogical Influences: Pedagogical influences tended to focus on science and maths. In discussing science, the majority of the girls identified biology and chemistry as more ‘realistic’ whilst physics was perceived to more suitable for boys. The personality of the teacher, and how a particular subject is taught, proved to be important influences shaping opinions.Social Influences: Societal influences were reflected in the girls’ career choice with the majority considering medical or social science related careers. Although all of the girls believed engineering to be ‘male dominated’, none believed that a woman should not be engineer.Familial Influences: Parental influence was identified as key to career and study choice; only two of the girls had discussed engineering with their parents of which only one was being actively encouraged to pursue a career in engineering.Discussion: The study found that one of the most significant barriers to engineering is a lack of awareness. Engineering did not register in the girls’ lives, it was not taught in school, and only one had met a female engineer. Building on the study findings, the discussion considers how engineering could be made more attractive to young women. Whilst misconceptions about what an engineer is need to be addressed, other more fundamental pedagogical barriers, such as the need to make physics more attractive to girls and the need to develop the curriculum so as to meet the learning needs of 21st Century students are discussed.By drawing attention to the issues around gender and the barriers to engineering, this paper contributes to current debates in this area – in doing so it provides food for thought about policy and practice in engineering and engineering education.

AB - Background: Stereotypically perceived to be an ‘all male’ occupation, engineering has for many years failed to attract high numbers of young women [1,2]. The reasons for this are varied, but tend to focus on misconceptions of the profession as being more suitable for men. In seeking to investigate this issue a participatory research approach was adopted [3] in which two 17 year-old female high school students interviewed twenty high school girls. Questions focused on the girls’ perceptions of engineering as a study and career choice. The findings were recorded and analysed using qualitative techniques. The study identified three distinctive ‘influences’ as being pivotal to girls’ perceptions of engineering; pedagogical; social; and, familial.Pedagogical Influences: Pedagogical influences tended to focus on science and maths. In discussing science, the majority of the girls identified biology and chemistry as more ‘realistic’ whilst physics was perceived to more suitable for boys. The personality of the teacher, and how a particular subject is taught, proved to be important influences shaping opinions.Social Influences: Societal influences were reflected in the girls’ career choice with the majority considering medical or social science related careers. Although all of the girls believed engineering to be ‘male dominated’, none believed that a woman should not be engineer.Familial Influences: Parental influence was identified as key to career and study choice; only two of the girls had discussed engineering with their parents of which only one was being actively encouraged to pursue a career in engineering.Discussion: The study found that one of the most significant barriers to engineering is a lack of awareness. Engineering did not register in the girls’ lives, it was not taught in school, and only one had met a female engineer. Building on the study findings, the discussion considers how engineering could be made more attractive to young women. Whilst misconceptions about what an engineer is need to be addressed, other more fundamental pedagogical barriers, such as the need to make physics more attractive to girls and the need to develop the curriculum so as to meet the learning needs of 21st Century students are discussed.By drawing attention to the issues around gender and the barriers to engineering, this paper contributes to current debates in this area – in doing so it provides food for thought about policy and practice in engineering and engineering education.

KW - girls

KW - engineering

KW - barriers

KW - gender

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939528596&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.sefi.be/conference-2012/Papers/Papers/078.pdf

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84939528596

SN - 9782873520052

BT - SEFI 40th annual conference

PB - Société Eropéenne pour la Formation des Ingénieurs

CY - Brussels (BE)

ER -

Andrews J, Clark R. Breaking down barriers: teenage girls’ perceptions of engineering as a study and career choice. In SEFI 40th annual conference. Brussels (BE): Société Eropéenne pour la Formation des Ingénieurs. 2012