Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research

Rachel Shaw*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter, comment or opinion

Abstract

On behalf of my coauthors, Dr Michael Larkin and Professor Paul Flowers, and I would like to thank Dr Pierre Pluye for his letter in response to our article.1 Dr Pluye supported our argument that a broader evidence base is needed in evidence-based healthcare. He provided the readers of this journal with important additional information which updates them on the progress in the area of mixed studies reviews and further detail about the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).2
Since writing our …
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)80
Number of pages1
JournalEvidence-based Medicine
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2015

Bibliographical note

This article has been accepted for publication in Evidence-based medicine following peer review. The definitive copyedited, typeset version Shaw, R. (2015). Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research. Evidence-based medicine, 20(2), 80 is available online at: Shaw, R. (2015). Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research. Evidence-based medicine, 20(2), 80

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this