Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

Abstract

On behalf of my coauthors, Dr Michael Larkin and Professor Paul Flowers, and I would like to thank Dr Pierre Pluye for his letter in response to our article.1 Dr Pluye supported our argument that a broader evidence base is needed in evidence-based healthcare. He provided the readers of this journal with important additional information which updates them on the progress in the area of mixed studies reviews and further detail about the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).2
Since writing our …
LanguageEnglish
Pages80
Number of pages1
JournalEvidence-based Medicine
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2015

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Practice
Research

Bibliographical note

This article has been accepted for publication in Evidence-based medicine following peer review. The definitive copyedited, typeset version Shaw, R. (2015). Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research. Evidence-based medicine, 20(2), 80 is available online at: Shaw, R. (2015). Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research. Evidence-based medicine, 20(2), 80

Cite this

@article{95300dfaedde4d358d8bce48c2c92bf4,
title = "Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research",
abstract = "On behalf of my coauthors, Dr Michael Larkin and Professor Paul Flowers, and I would like to thank Dr Pierre Pluye for his letter in response to our article.1 Dr Pluye supported our argument that a broader evidence base is needed in evidence-based healthcare. He provided the readers of this journal with important additional information which updates them on the progress in the area of mixed studies reviews and further detail about the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).2Since writing our …",
author = "Rachel Shaw",
note = "This article has been accepted for publication in Evidence-based medicine following peer review. The definitive copyedited, typeset version Shaw, R. (2015). Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research. Evidence-based medicine, 20(2), 80 is available online at: Shaw, R. (2015). Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research. Evidence-based medicine, 20(2), 80",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1136/ebmed-2014-110165",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "80",
journal = "Evidence-based Medicine",
issn = "1356-5524",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "2",

}

Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research. / Shaw, Rachel.

In: Evidence-based Medicine, Vol. 20, No. 2, 04.2015, p. 80.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

TY - JOUR

T1 - Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research

AU - Shaw, Rachel

N1 - This article has been accepted for publication in Evidence-based medicine following peer review. The definitive copyedited, typeset version Shaw, R. (2015). Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research. Evidence-based medicine, 20(2), 80 is available online at: Shaw, R. (2015). Broadening the evidence base and the mind when thinking about mixed methods research. Evidence-based medicine, 20(2), 80

PY - 2015/4

Y1 - 2015/4

N2 - On behalf of my coauthors, Dr Michael Larkin and Professor Paul Flowers, and I would like to thank Dr Pierre Pluye for his letter in response to our article.1 Dr Pluye supported our argument that a broader evidence base is needed in evidence-based healthcare. He provided the readers of this journal with important additional information which updates them on the progress in the area of mixed studies reviews and further detail about the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).2Since writing our …

AB - On behalf of my coauthors, Dr Michael Larkin and Professor Paul Flowers, and I would like to thank Dr Pierre Pluye for his letter in response to our article.1 Dr Pluye supported our argument that a broader evidence base is needed in evidence-based healthcare. He provided the readers of this journal with important additional information which updates them on the progress in the area of mixed studies reviews and further detail about the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).2Since writing our …

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928155240&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/ebmed-2014-110165

DO - 10.1136/ebmed-2014-110165

M3 - Letter

VL - 20

SP - 80

JO - Evidence-based Medicine

T2 - Evidence-based Medicine

JF - Evidence-based Medicine

SN - 1356-5524

IS - 2

ER -