Do labour laws protect labour in India? Union experiences of workplace employment regulations in Maharashtra India

Vidu Badigannavar, John Kelly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The debate over labour market regulations in India is highly polarised. Advocates of labour market deregulation suggest that the labour law framework in the country confers disproportionate powers on workers and trade unions in the formal sector of the economy, resulting in industrial conflicts and poor productivity. Using workplace union survey data from the state of Maharashtra, this paper examines the veracity of these claims. Maharashtra is recognised as a state with a broadly pro-worker labour law framework. We find that even pro-worker labour laws at best offer only weak protection to workers and unions in the formal sector establishments. Unions find themselves increasingly vulnerable to employer hostility. We discuss these findings in the context of the role of state and judiciary in employment relations and of union links with political parties.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)439-470
Number of pages32
JournalIndustrial Law Journal
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

labor law
workplace
labor
India
worker
regulation
experience
labor market
trade union
judiciary
deregulation
employer
productivity
economy

Cite this

@article{53a476021bcd4466965ef54540db9459,
title = "Do labour laws protect labour in India? Union experiences of workplace employment regulations in Maharashtra India",
abstract = "The debate over labour market regulations in India is highly polarised. Advocates of labour market deregulation suggest that the labour law framework in the country confers disproportionate powers on workers and trade unions in the formal sector of the economy, resulting in industrial conflicts and poor productivity. Using workplace union survey data from the state of Maharashtra, this paper examines the veracity of these claims. Maharashtra is recognised as a state with a broadly pro-worker labour law framework. We find that even pro-worker labour laws at best offer only weak protection to workers and unions in the formal sector establishments. Unions find themselves increasingly vulnerable to employer hostility. We discuss these findings in the context of the role of state and judiciary in employment relations and of union links with political parties.",
author = "Vidu Badigannavar and John Kelly",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1093/indlaw/dws038",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "439--470",
journal = "Industrial Law Journal",
issn = "0305-9332",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

Do labour laws protect labour in India? Union experiences of workplace employment regulations in Maharashtra India. / Badigannavar, Vidu; Kelly, John.

In: Industrial Law Journal, Vol. 41, No. 4, 2012, p. 439-470.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do labour laws protect labour in India? Union experiences of workplace employment regulations in Maharashtra India

AU - Badigannavar, Vidu

AU - Kelly, John

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The debate over labour market regulations in India is highly polarised. Advocates of labour market deregulation suggest that the labour law framework in the country confers disproportionate powers on workers and trade unions in the formal sector of the economy, resulting in industrial conflicts and poor productivity. Using workplace union survey data from the state of Maharashtra, this paper examines the veracity of these claims. Maharashtra is recognised as a state with a broadly pro-worker labour law framework. We find that even pro-worker labour laws at best offer only weak protection to workers and unions in the formal sector establishments. Unions find themselves increasingly vulnerable to employer hostility. We discuss these findings in the context of the role of state and judiciary in employment relations and of union links with political parties.

AB - The debate over labour market regulations in India is highly polarised. Advocates of labour market deregulation suggest that the labour law framework in the country confers disproportionate powers on workers and trade unions in the formal sector of the economy, resulting in industrial conflicts and poor productivity. Using workplace union survey data from the state of Maharashtra, this paper examines the veracity of these claims. Maharashtra is recognised as a state with a broadly pro-worker labour law framework. We find that even pro-worker labour laws at best offer only weak protection to workers and unions in the formal sector establishments. Unions find themselves increasingly vulnerable to employer hostility. We discuss these findings in the context of the role of state and judiciary in employment relations and of union links with political parties.

UR - http://ilj.oxfordjournals.org/content/41/4/439

U2 - 10.1093/indlaw/dws038

DO - 10.1093/indlaw/dws038

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 439

EP - 470

JO - Industrial Law Journal

JF - Industrial Law Journal

SN - 0305-9332

IS - 4

ER -