Does rapport-building boost the eyewitness eyeclosure effect in closed questioning?

Robert A. Nash, Alena Nash, Aimee Morris, Siobhan L. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose

Several studies have documented that people's ability to correctly report details of witnessed events is enhanced when they merely close their eyes. Yet closing one's eyes in front of a stranger could sometimes create social discomfort, which other studies suggest can impair memory reports. This paper reports two experiments exploring the extent to which the memory benefits of eyeclosure are enhanced when efforts are taken to build interviewer/witness rapport, thus potentially reducing discomfort.

Methods

In both studies participants observed filmed events and, afterwards, half underwent a basic rapport‐building exercise with an interviewer. All participants then answered closed questions about specific details of the event, and half were instructed to close their eyes throughout this questioning. We recorded the proportion of questions answered correctly, incorrectly, or with ‘don't know’ responses.

Results

Both eyeclosure and rapport‐building separately enhanced correct responding. The data offer no evidence, though, that rapport‐building moderated this eyeclosure benefit. This is despite the fact that rapport‐building did appear to moderate the effect of eyeclosure on participants' self‐reported comfort during the interviews.

Conclusions

These studies give us initial cause for doubt over a hypothesized – but heretofore untested – social psychological constraint on the benefits of eyeclosure.

LanguageEnglish
Pages305–318
Number of pages16
JournalLegal and Criminological Psychology
Volume21
Issue number2
Early online date15 Jan 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2016

Fingerprint

Interviews
Aptitude
Psychology

Bibliographical note

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Nash, R. A., Nash, A., Morris, A., & Smith, S. L. (2016). Does rapport-building boost the eyewitness eyeclosure effect in closed questioning? Legal and Criminological Psychology, 21(2), 305–318. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

Keywords

  • comfort
  • eyeclosure
  • eyewitness interviewing
  • questioning
  • rapport

Cite this

Nash, Robert A. ; Nash, Alena ; Morris, Aimee ; Smith, Siobhan L. / Does rapport-building boost the eyewitness eyeclosure effect in closed questioning?. In: Legal and Criminological Psychology. 2016 ; Vol. 21, No. 2. pp. 305–318.
@article{70255a6d3e2a46f3a5a7d1977b113261,
title = "Does rapport-building boost the eyewitness eyeclosure effect in closed questioning?",
abstract = "Purpose Several studies have documented that people's ability to correctly report details of witnessed events is enhanced when they merely close their eyes. Yet closing one's eyes in front of a stranger could sometimes create social discomfort, which other studies suggest can impair memory reports. This paper reports two experiments exploring the extent to which the memory benefits of eyeclosure are enhanced when efforts are taken to build interviewer/witness rapport, thus potentially reducing discomfort. Methods In both studies participants observed filmed events and, afterwards, half underwent a basic rapport‐building exercise with an interviewer. All participants then answered closed questions about specific details of the event, and half were instructed to close their eyes throughout this questioning. We recorded the proportion of questions answered correctly, incorrectly, or with ‘don't know’ responses. Results Both eyeclosure and rapport‐building separately enhanced correct responding. The data offer no evidence, though, that rapport‐building moderated this eyeclosure benefit. This is despite the fact that rapport‐building did appear to moderate the effect of eyeclosure on participants' self‐reported comfort during the interviews. Conclusions These studies give us initial cause for doubt over a hypothesized – but heretofore untested – social psychological constraint on the benefits of eyeclosure.",
keywords = "comfort, eyeclosure, eyewitness interviewing, questioning, rapport",
author = "Nash, {Robert A.} and Alena Nash and Aimee Morris and Smith, {Siobhan L.}",
note = "This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Nash, R. A., Nash, A., Morris, A., & Smith, S. L. (2016). Does rapport-building boost the eyewitness eyeclosure effect in closed questioning? Legal and Criminological Psychology, 21(2), 305–318. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/lcrp.12073",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "305–318",
journal = "Legal and Criminological Psychology",
issn = "1355-3259",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Does rapport-building boost the eyewitness eyeclosure effect in closed questioning? / Nash, Robert A.; Nash, Alena; Morris, Aimee; Smith, Siobhan L.

In: Legal and Criminological Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 2, 09.2016, p. 305–318.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does rapport-building boost the eyewitness eyeclosure effect in closed questioning?

AU - Nash, Robert A.

AU - Nash, Alena

AU - Morris, Aimee

AU - Smith, Siobhan L.

N1 - This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Nash, R. A., Nash, A., Morris, A., & Smith, S. L. (2016). Does rapport-building boost the eyewitness eyeclosure effect in closed questioning? Legal and Criminological Psychology, 21(2), 305–318. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

PY - 2016/9

Y1 - 2016/9

N2 - Purpose Several studies have documented that people's ability to correctly report details of witnessed events is enhanced when they merely close their eyes. Yet closing one's eyes in front of a stranger could sometimes create social discomfort, which other studies suggest can impair memory reports. This paper reports two experiments exploring the extent to which the memory benefits of eyeclosure are enhanced when efforts are taken to build interviewer/witness rapport, thus potentially reducing discomfort. Methods In both studies participants observed filmed events and, afterwards, half underwent a basic rapport‐building exercise with an interviewer. All participants then answered closed questions about specific details of the event, and half were instructed to close their eyes throughout this questioning. We recorded the proportion of questions answered correctly, incorrectly, or with ‘don't know’ responses. Results Both eyeclosure and rapport‐building separately enhanced correct responding. The data offer no evidence, though, that rapport‐building moderated this eyeclosure benefit. This is despite the fact that rapport‐building did appear to moderate the effect of eyeclosure on participants' self‐reported comfort during the interviews. Conclusions These studies give us initial cause for doubt over a hypothesized – but heretofore untested – social psychological constraint on the benefits of eyeclosure.

AB - Purpose Several studies have documented that people's ability to correctly report details of witnessed events is enhanced when they merely close their eyes. Yet closing one's eyes in front of a stranger could sometimes create social discomfort, which other studies suggest can impair memory reports. This paper reports two experiments exploring the extent to which the memory benefits of eyeclosure are enhanced when efforts are taken to build interviewer/witness rapport, thus potentially reducing discomfort. Methods In both studies participants observed filmed events and, afterwards, half underwent a basic rapport‐building exercise with an interviewer. All participants then answered closed questions about specific details of the event, and half were instructed to close their eyes throughout this questioning. We recorded the proportion of questions answered correctly, incorrectly, or with ‘don't know’ responses. Results Both eyeclosure and rapport‐building separately enhanced correct responding. The data offer no evidence, though, that rapport‐building moderated this eyeclosure benefit. This is despite the fact that rapport‐building did appear to moderate the effect of eyeclosure on participants' self‐reported comfort during the interviews. Conclusions These studies give us initial cause for doubt over a hypothesized – but heretofore untested – social psychological constraint on the benefits of eyeclosure.

KW - comfort

KW - eyeclosure

KW - eyewitness interviewing

KW - questioning

KW - rapport

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lcrp.12073/abstract

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923103784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/lcrp.12073

DO - 10.1111/lcrp.12073

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 305

EP - 318

JO - Legal and Criminological Psychology

T2 - Legal and Criminological Psychology

JF - Legal and Criminological Psychology

SN - 1355-3259

IS - 2

ER -