Embodied myopia

Bram Van den Bergh, Julien Schmitt, Luk Warlop

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

One field study and five experiments show that seemingly irrelevant bodily actions influence consumer behavior. These studies demonstrate that arm flexion (in which the motor action is directed toward the self) versus arm extension (in which the motor action is directed away from the self) influences purchase behavior, product preferences, and economic decisions. More specifically, arm flexion increases the likelihood of purchasing vice products (Study 1a), leads to a preference for vices over virtues (Studies 1b and 2a), and leads to preference for smaller, sooner over larger, later monetary rewards (Studies 2b, 3, and 4). The authors argue that arm flexion induces present-biased preferences through activation of approach motivation. The effect of bodily actions on present-biased preferences is regulated by the behavioral approach system (Studies 3 and 4) and relies on the learned association between arm flexion and activation of this approach system (Study 4). The authors discuss implications for Intertemporal decision making, embodied cognition, and marketing practice. © 2011, American Marketing Association.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1033-1044
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Marketing Research
Volume48
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2011

Fingerprint

Myopia
Present-biased preferences
Activation
Systems approach
Field study
Purchase behavior
Experiment
Marketing
Reward
Decision making
Marketing practices
Consumer behaviour
Economics
Cognition
Purchasing

Cite this

Van den Bergh, B., Schmitt, J., & Warlop, L. (2011). Embodied myopia. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(6), 1033-1044. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.09.0503
Van den Bergh, Bram ; Schmitt, Julien ; Warlop, Luk. / Embodied myopia. In: Journal of Marketing Research. 2011 ; Vol. 48, No. 6. pp. 1033-1044.
@article{f6a7902e85344556ad5b9039d7266595,
title = "Embodied myopia",
abstract = "One field study and five experiments show that seemingly irrelevant bodily actions influence consumer behavior. These studies demonstrate that arm flexion (in which the motor action is directed toward the self) versus arm extension (in which the motor action is directed away from the self) influences purchase behavior, product preferences, and economic decisions. More specifically, arm flexion increases the likelihood of purchasing vice products (Study 1a), leads to a preference for vices over virtues (Studies 1b and 2a), and leads to preference for smaller, sooner over larger, later monetary rewards (Studies 2b, 3, and 4). The authors argue that arm flexion induces present-biased preferences through activation of approach motivation. The effect of bodily actions on present-biased preferences is regulated by the behavioral approach system (Studies 3 and 4) and relies on the learned association between arm flexion and activation of this approach system (Study 4). The authors discuss implications for Intertemporal decision making, embodied cognition, and marketing practice. {\circledC} 2011, American Marketing Association.",
author = "{Van den Bergh}, Bram and Julien Schmitt and Luk Warlop",
year = "2011",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1509/jmr.09.0503",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "1033--1044",
journal = "Journal of Marketing Research",
issn = "0022-2437",
publisher = "American Marketing Association",
number = "6",

}

Van den Bergh, B, Schmitt, J & Warlop, L 2011, 'Embodied myopia', Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1033-1044. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.09.0503

Embodied myopia. / Van den Bergh, Bram; Schmitt, Julien; Warlop, Luk.

In: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 48, No. 6, 12.2011, p. 1033-1044.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Embodied myopia

AU - Van den Bergh, Bram

AU - Schmitt, Julien

AU - Warlop, Luk

PY - 2011/12

Y1 - 2011/12

N2 - One field study and five experiments show that seemingly irrelevant bodily actions influence consumer behavior. These studies demonstrate that arm flexion (in which the motor action is directed toward the self) versus arm extension (in which the motor action is directed away from the self) influences purchase behavior, product preferences, and economic decisions. More specifically, arm flexion increases the likelihood of purchasing vice products (Study 1a), leads to a preference for vices over virtues (Studies 1b and 2a), and leads to preference for smaller, sooner over larger, later monetary rewards (Studies 2b, 3, and 4). The authors argue that arm flexion induces present-biased preferences through activation of approach motivation. The effect of bodily actions on present-biased preferences is regulated by the behavioral approach system (Studies 3 and 4) and relies on the learned association between arm flexion and activation of this approach system (Study 4). The authors discuss implications for Intertemporal decision making, embodied cognition, and marketing practice. © 2011, American Marketing Association.

AB - One field study and five experiments show that seemingly irrelevant bodily actions influence consumer behavior. These studies demonstrate that arm flexion (in which the motor action is directed toward the self) versus arm extension (in which the motor action is directed away from the self) influences purchase behavior, product preferences, and economic decisions. More specifically, arm flexion increases the likelihood of purchasing vice products (Study 1a), leads to a preference for vices over virtues (Studies 1b and 2a), and leads to preference for smaller, sooner over larger, later monetary rewards (Studies 2b, 3, and 4). The authors argue that arm flexion induces present-biased preferences through activation of approach motivation. The effect of bodily actions on present-biased preferences is regulated by the behavioral approach system (Studies 3 and 4) and relies on the learned association between arm flexion and activation of this approach system (Study 4). The authors discuss implications for Intertemporal decision making, embodied cognition, and marketing practice. © 2011, American Marketing Association.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855163743&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1509/jmr.09.0503

DO - 10.1509/jmr.09.0503

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 1033

EP - 1044

JO - Journal of Marketing Research

JF - Journal of Marketing Research

SN - 0022-2437

IS - 6

ER -

Van den Bergh B, Schmitt J, Warlop L. Embodied myopia. Journal of Marketing Research. 2011 Dec;48(6):1033-1044. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.09.0503