Expanding the evidence within evidence-based healthcare: thinking about the context, acceptability and feasibility of interventions

Rachel L. Shaw, Michael Larkin, Paul Flowers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine is crucial to contemporary healthcare. It is dependent on systematic review methodology modelled on an arguably inadequate hierarchy of evidence. There has been a significant increase in medical and health research using qualitative and mixed method designs. The perspective taken in this article is that we need to broaden our evidence base if we are to fully take account of issues of context, acceptability and feasibility in the development and implementation of healthcare interventions. One way of doing this is to use a range of methods that better fit the different aspects of intervention development and implementation. Methods for the systematic review of evidence, other than randomised-controlled trials, are available and there is a readiness to incorporate these other types of evidence into good-practice guidance, but we need a clear methodology to translate these advances in research into the world of policy.

LanguageEnglish
Pages201-203
Number of pages3
JournalEvidence-based Medicine
Volume19
Issue number6
Early online date5 May 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Practice
Delivery of Health Care
Evidence-Based Medicine
Biomedical Research
Randomized Controlled Trials
Health
Research

Bibliographical note

This article has been accepted for publication in Evidence-based medicine
following peer review. The definitive copyedited, typeset version Shaw, R. L., Larkin, M., & Flowers, P. (2014). Expanding the evidence within evidence-based healthcare: thinking about the context, acceptability and feasibility of interventions. Evidence-based medicine, 19(6), 201-203 is available online at:
http://ebm.bmj.com/content/19/6/201

Cite this

@article{16e6ace1bfd54b558b12b36ef1e5ae3f,
title = "Expanding the evidence within evidence-based healthcare: thinking about the context, acceptability and feasibility of interventions",
abstract = "Evidence-based medicine is crucial to contemporary healthcare. It is dependent on systematic review methodology modelled on an arguably inadequate hierarchy of evidence. There has been a significant increase in medical and health research using qualitative and mixed method designs. The perspective taken in this article is that we need to broaden our evidence base if we are to fully take account of issues of context, acceptability and feasibility in the development and implementation of healthcare interventions. One way of doing this is to use a range of methods that better fit the different aspects of intervention development and implementation. Methods for the systematic review of evidence, other than randomised-controlled trials, are available and there is a readiness to incorporate these other types of evidence into good-practice guidance, but we need a clear methodology to translate these advances in research into the world of policy.",
author = "Shaw, {Rachel L.} and Michael Larkin and Paul Flowers",
note = "This article has been accepted for publication in Evidence-based medicine following peer review. The definitive copyedited, typeset version Shaw, R. L., Larkin, M., & Flowers, P. (2014). Expanding the evidence within evidence-based healthcare: thinking about the context, acceptability and feasibility of interventions. Evidence-based medicine, 19(6), 201-203 is available online at: http://ebm.bmj.com/content/19/6/201",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1136/eb-2014-101791",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "201--203",
journal = "Evidence-based Medicine",
issn = "1356-5524",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6",

}

Expanding the evidence within evidence-based healthcare : thinking about the context, acceptability and feasibility of interventions. / Shaw, Rachel L.; Larkin, Michael; Flowers, Paul.

In: Evidence-based Medicine, Vol. 19, No. 6, 2014, p. 201-203.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expanding the evidence within evidence-based healthcare

T2 - Evidence-based Medicine

AU - Shaw, Rachel L.

AU - Larkin, Michael

AU - Flowers, Paul

N1 - This article has been accepted for publication in Evidence-based medicine following peer review. The definitive copyedited, typeset version Shaw, R. L., Larkin, M., & Flowers, P. (2014). Expanding the evidence within evidence-based healthcare: thinking about the context, acceptability and feasibility of interventions. Evidence-based medicine, 19(6), 201-203 is available online at: http://ebm.bmj.com/content/19/6/201

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Evidence-based medicine is crucial to contemporary healthcare. It is dependent on systematic review methodology modelled on an arguably inadequate hierarchy of evidence. There has been a significant increase in medical and health research using qualitative and mixed method designs. The perspective taken in this article is that we need to broaden our evidence base if we are to fully take account of issues of context, acceptability and feasibility in the development and implementation of healthcare interventions. One way of doing this is to use a range of methods that better fit the different aspects of intervention development and implementation. Methods for the systematic review of evidence, other than randomised-controlled trials, are available and there is a readiness to incorporate these other types of evidence into good-practice guidance, but we need a clear methodology to translate these advances in research into the world of policy.

AB - Evidence-based medicine is crucial to contemporary healthcare. It is dependent on systematic review methodology modelled on an arguably inadequate hierarchy of evidence. There has been a significant increase in medical and health research using qualitative and mixed method designs. The perspective taken in this article is that we need to broaden our evidence base if we are to fully take account of issues of context, acceptability and feasibility in the development and implementation of healthcare interventions. One way of doing this is to use a range of methods that better fit the different aspects of intervention development and implementation. Methods for the systematic review of evidence, other than randomised-controlled trials, are available and there is a readiness to incorporate these other types of evidence into good-practice guidance, but we need a clear methodology to translate these advances in research into the world of policy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911984560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/eb-2014-101791

DO - 10.1136/eb-2014-101791

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 201

EP - 203

JO - Evidence-based Medicine

JF - Evidence-based Medicine

SN - 1356-5524

IS - 6

ER -