Exploring the optimum step size for defocus curves

James S. Wolffsohn*, Amit N. Jinabhai, Alec Kingsnorth, Amy L. Sheppard, Shehzad A. Naroo, Sunil Shah, Phillip Buckhurst, Lee A. Hall, Graeme Young

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of reducing the number of visual acuity measurements made in a defocus curve on the quality of data quantified. Setting: Midland Eye, Solihull, United Kingdom. Design: Evaluation of a technique. Methods: Defocus curves were constructed by measuring visual acuity on a distance logMAR letter chart, randomizing the test letters between lens presentations. The lens powers evaluated ranged between +1.50 diopters (D) and -5.00 D in 0.50 D steps, which were also presented in a randomized order. Defocus curves were measured binocularly with the Tecnis diffractive, Rezoom refractive, Lentis rotationally asymmetric segmented (+3.00 D addition [add]), and Finevision trifocal multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) implanted bilaterally, and also for the diffractive IOL and refractive or rotationally asymmetric segmented (+3.00 D and +1.50 D adds) multifocal IOLs implanted contralaterally. Relative and absolute range of clear-focus metrics and area metrics were calculated for curves fitted using 0.50 D, 1.00 D, and 1.50 D steps and a near add-specific profile (ie, distance, half the near add, and the full near-add powers). Results: A significant difference in simulated results was found in at least 1 of the relative or absolute range of clear-focus or area metrics for each of the multifocal designs examined when the defocus-curve step size was increased (P<.05). Conclusion: Faster methods of capturing defocus curves from multifocal IOL designs appear to distort the metric results and are therefore not valid. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. © 2013 ASCRS and ESCRS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)873-880
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
Volume39
Issue number6
Early online date18 May 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Intraocular Lenses
Lenses
Visual Acuity
Disclosure

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2013 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite this

Wolffsohn, James S. ; Jinabhai, Amit N. ; Kingsnorth, Alec ; Sheppard, Amy L. ; Naroo, Shehzad A. ; Shah, Sunil ; Buckhurst, Phillip ; Hall, Lee A. ; Young, Graeme. / Exploring the optimum step size for defocus curves. In: Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2013 ; Vol. 39, No. 6. pp. 873-880.
@article{9f220ec6faad42b89a9fbe42e776a14c,
title = "Exploring the optimum step size for defocus curves",
abstract = "Purpose: To evaluate the effect of reducing the number of visual acuity measurements made in a defocus curve on the quality of data quantified. Setting: Midland Eye, Solihull, United Kingdom. Design: Evaluation of a technique. Methods: Defocus curves were constructed by measuring visual acuity on a distance logMAR letter chart, randomizing the test letters between lens presentations. The lens powers evaluated ranged between +1.50 diopters (D) and -5.00 D in 0.50 D steps, which were also presented in a randomized order. Defocus curves were measured binocularly with the Tecnis diffractive, Rezoom refractive, Lentis rotationally asymmetric segmented (+3.00 D addition [add]), and Finevision trifocal multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) implanted bilaterally, and also for the diffractive IOL and refractive or rotationally asymmetric segmented (+3.00 D and +1.50 D adds) multifocal IOLs implanted contralaterally. Relative and absolute range of clear-focus metrics and area metrics were calculated for curves fitted using 0.50 D, 1.00 D, and 1.50 D steps and a near add-specific profile (ie, distance, half the near add, and the full near-add powers). Results: A significant difference in simulated results was found in at least 1 of the relative or absolute range of clear-focus or area metrics for each of the multifocal designs examined when the defocus-curve step size was increased (P<.05). Conclusion: Faster methods of capturing defocus curves from multifocal IOL designs appear to distort the metric results and are therefore not valid. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. {\circledC} 2013 ASCRS and ESCRS.",
author = "Wolffsohn, {James S.} and Jinabhai, {Amit N.} and Alec Kingsnorth and Sheppard, {Amy L.} and Naroo, {Shehzad A.} and Sunil Shah and Phillip Buckhurst and Hall, {Lee A.} and Graeme Young",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2013 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.01.031",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "873--880",
journal = "Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery",
issn = "0886-3350",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

Exploring the optimum step size for defocus curves. / Wolffsohn, James S.; Jinabhai, Amit N.; Kingsnorth, Alec; Sheppard, Amy L.; Naroo, Shehzad A.; Shah, Sunil; Buckhurst, Phillip; Hall, Lee A.; Young, Graeme.

In: Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Vol. 39, No. 6, 06.2013, p. 873-880.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring the optimum step size for defocus curves

AU - Wolffsohn, James S.

AU - Jinabhai, Amit N.

AU - Kingsnorth, Alec

AU - Sheppard, Amy L.

AU - Naroo, Shehzad A.

AU - Shah, Sunil

AU - Buckhurst, Phillip

AU - Hall, Lee A.

AU - Young, Graeme

N1 - Copyright © 2013 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the effect of reducing the number of visual acuity measurements made in a defocus curve on the quality of data quantified. Setting: Midland Eye, Solihull, United Kingdom. Design: Evaluation of a technique. Methods: Defocus curves were constructed by measuring visual acuity on a distance logMAR letter chart, randomizing the test letters between lens presentations. The lens powers evaluated ranged between +1.50 diopters (D) and -5.00 D in 0.50 D steps, which were also presented in a randomized order. Defocus curves were measured binocularly with the Tecnis diffractive, Rezoom refractive, Lentis rotationally asymmetric segmented (+3.00 D addition [add]), and Finevision trifocal multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) implanted bilaterally, and also for the diffractive IOL and refractive or rotationally asymmetric segmented (+3.00 D and +1.50 D adds) multifocal IOLs implanted contralaterally. Relative and absolute range of clear-focus metrics and area metrics were calculated for curves fitted using 0.50 D, 1.00 D, and 1.50 D steps and a near add-specific profile (ie, distance, half the near add, and the full near-add powers). Results: A significant difference in simulated results was found in at least 1 of the relative or absolute range of clear-focus or area metrics for each of the multifocal designs examined when the defocus-curve step size was increased (P<.05). Conclusion: Faster methods of capturing defocus curves from multifocal IOL designs appear to distort the metric results and are therefore not valid. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. © 2013 ASCRS and ESCRS.

AB - Purpose: To evaluate the effect of reducing the number of visual acuity measurements made in a defocus curve on the quality of data quantified. Setting: Midland Eye, Solihull, United Kingdom. Design: Evaluation of a technique. Methods: Defocus curves were constructed by measuring visual acuity on a distance logMAR letter chart, randomizing the test letters between lens presentations. The lens powers evaluated ranged between +1.50 diopters (D) and -5.00 D in 0.50 D steps, which were also presented in a randomized order. Defocus curves were measured binocularly with the Tecnis diffractive, Rezoom refractive, Lentis rotationally asymmetric segmented (+3.00 D addition [add]), and Finevision trifocal multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) implanted bilaterally, and also for the diffractive IOL and refractive or rotationally asymmetric segmented (+3.00 D and +1.50 D adds) multifocal IOLs implanted contralaterally. Relative and absolute range of clear-focus metrics and area metrics were calculated for curves fitted using 0.50 D, 1.00 D, and 1.50 D steps and a near add-specific profile (ie, distance, half the near add, and the full near-add powers). Results: A significant difference in simulated results was found in at least 1 of the relative or absolute range of clear-focus or area metrics for each of the multifocal designs examined when the defocus-curve step size was increased (P<.05). Conclusion: Faster methods of capturing defocus curves from multifocal IOL designs appear to distort the metric results and are therefore not valid. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. © 2013 ASCRS and ESCRS.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84877995992&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.01.031

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.01.031

M3 - Article

C2 - 23688874

VL - 39

SP - 873

EP - 880

JO - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

SN - 0886-3350

IS - 6

ER -