Partnership and organizing: an empirical assessment of two contrasting approaches to union revitalization in the UK

Vidu Badigannavar, John Kelly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Trades Union Congress (TUC) in Britain has been advocating two contrasting approaches to union revitalization namely: ‘labour—management partnership’ and ‘union organizing’. Using a case study of a public services union this article examines empirically the prospects of union revival offered by these two contrasting approaches. Public services with relatively high union density should offer better prospects for union revival through partnership. However, the authors’ findings indicate that even in public services, partnership was not associated with management’s support for union recruitment, better facility time provisions for union representatives, lower worker grievances or union membership gains. Rank-and-file organizing, on the other hand, was associated with lower worker grievances, greater worker satisfaction with the union, higher worker involvement in union activities and union membership gains. Overall, the findings question the ‘mutual gains’ assertions of partnership advocates and lend support to the critics of partnership who propose an alternative organizing approach to union revitalization.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)5-27
Number of pages23
JournalEconomic and Industrial Democracy
Volume32
Issue number1
Early online date24 May 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2011

Fingerprint

Revitalization
Organizing
Workers
Public services
Union membership
Grievance
Union density
Trade unions
Management support
Union organizing

Keywords

  • industrial relations
  • labour—management cooperation
  • partnership
  • union organizing

Cite this

Badigannavar, Vidu ; Kelly, John. / Partnership and organizing : an empirical assessment of two contrasting approaches to union revitalization in the UK. In: Economic and Industrial Democracy. 2011 ; Vol. 32, No. 1. pp. 5-27.
@article{c75064be4d7448bf94c44c1ec308a7c2,
title = "Partnership and organizing: an empirical assessment of two contrasting approaches to union revitalization in the UK",
abstract = "The Trades Union Congress (TUC) in Britain has been advocating two contrasting approaches to union revitalization namely: ‘labour—management partnership’ and ‘union organizing’. Using a case study of a public services union this article examines empirically the prospects of union revival offered by these two contrasting approaches. Public services with relatively high union density should offer better prospects for union revival through partnership. However, the authors’ findings indicate that even in public services, partnership was not associated with management’s support for union recruitment, better facility time provisions for union representatives, lower worker grievances or union membership gains. Rank-and-file organizing, on the other hand, was associated with lower worker grievances, greater worker satisfaction with the union, higher worker involvement in union activities and union membership gains. Overall, the findings question the ‘mutual gains’ assertions of partnership advocates and lend support to the critics of partnership who propose an alternative organizing approach to union revitalization.",
keywords = "industrial relations, labour—management cooperation, partnership, union organizing",
author = "Vidu Badigannavar and John Kelly",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1177/0143831X10365925",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "5--27",
number = "1",

}

Partnership and organizing : an empirical assessment of two contrasting approaches to union revitalization in the UK. / Badigannavar, Vidu; Kelly, John.

In: Economic and Industrial Democracy, Vol. 32, No. 1, 02.2011, p. 5-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Partnership and organizing

T2 - an empirical assessment of two contrasting approaches to union revitalization in the UK

AU - Badigannavar, Vidu

AU - Kelly, John

PY - 2011/2

Y1 - 2011/2

N2 - The Trades Union Congress (TUC) in Britain has been advocating two contrasting approaches to union revitalization namely: ‘labour—management partnership’ and ‘union organizing’. Using a case study of a public services union this article examines empirically the prospects of union revival offered by these two contrasting approaches. Public services with relatively high union density should offer better prospects for union revival through partnership. However, the authors’ findings indicate that even in public services, partnership was not associated with management’s support for union recruitment, better facility time provisions for union representatives, lower worker grievances or union membership gains. Rank-and-file organizing, on the other hand, was associated with lower worker grievances, greater worker satisfaction with the union, higher worker involvement in union activities and union membership gains. Overall, the findings question the ‘mutual gains’ assertions of partnership advocates and lend support to the critics of partnership who propose an alternative organizing approach to union revitalization.

AB - The Trades Union Congress (TUC) in Britain has been advocating two contrasting approaches to union revitalization namely: ‘labour—management partnership’ and ‘union organizing’. Using a case study of a public services union this article examines empirically the prospects of union revival offered by these two contrasting approaches. Public services with relatively high union density should offer better prospects for union revival through partnership. However, the authors’ findings indicate that even in public services, partnership was not associated with management’s support for union recruitment, better facility time provisions for union representatives, lower worker grievances or union membership gains. Rank-and-file organizing, on the other hand, was associated with lower worker grievances, greater worker satisfaction with the union, higher worker involvement in union activities and union membership gains. Overall, the findings question the ‘mutual gains’ assertions of partnership advocates and lend support to the critics of partnership who propose an alternative organizing approach to union revitalization.

KW - industrial relations

KW - labour—management cooperation

KW - partnership

KW - union organizing

UR - http://eid.sagepub.com/content/32/1/5.abstract

U2 - 10.1177/0143831X10365925

DO - 10.1177/0143831X10365925

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 5

EP - 27

IS - 1

ER -