Shared cognitive processes underlying past and future thinking: the impact of imagery and concurrent task demands on event specificity

Rachel J. Anderson*, Stephen A. Dewhurst, Robert A. Nash

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Recent literature has argued that whereas remembering the past and imagining the future make use of shared cognitive substrates, simulating future events places heavier demands on executive resources. These propositions were explored in 3 experiments comparing the impact of imagery and concurrent task demands on speed and accuracy of past event retrieval and future event simulation. Results provide support for the suggestion that both past and future episodes can be constructed through 2 mechanisms: a noneffortful "direct" pathway and a controlled, effortful "generative" pathway. However, limited evidence emerged for the suggestion that simulating of future, compared with retrieving past, episodes places heavier demands on executive resources; only under certain conditions did it emerge as a more error prone and lengthier process. The findings are discussed in terms of how retrieval and simulation make use of the same cognitive substrates in subtly different ways.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)356-365
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2012

Keywords

  • dual-task
  • future thinking
  • imagery
  • memory
  • mental time travel

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Shared cognitive processes underlying past and future thinking: the impact of imagery and concurrent task demands on event specificity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this