Theory and data for area summation of contrast with and without uncertainty

evidence for a noisy energy model

Tim Meese, Robert Summers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Contrast sensitivity improves with the area of a sine-wave grating, but why? Here we assess this phenomenon against contemporary models involving spatial summation, probability summation, uncertainty, and stochastic noise. Using a two-interval forced-choice procedure we measured contrast sensitivity for circular patches of sine-wave gratings with various diameters that were blocked or interleaved across trials to produce low and high extrinsic uncertainty, respectively. Summation curves were steep initially, becoming shallower thereafter. For the smaller stimuli, sensitivity was slightly worse for the interleaved design than for the blocked design. Neither area nor blocking affected the slope of the psychometric function. We derived model predictions for noisy mechanisms and extrinsic uncertainty that was either low or high. The contrast transducer was either linear (c1.0) or nonlinear (c2.0), and pooling was either linear or a MAX operation. There was either no intrinsic uncertainty, or it was fixed or proportional to stimulus size. Of these 10 canonical models, only the nonlinear transducer with linear pooling (the noisy energy model) described the main forms of the data for both experimental designs. We also show how a cross-correlator can be modified to fit our results and provide a contemporary presentation of the relation between summation and the slope of the psychometric function.
Original languageEnglish
Article number9
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume12
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Oct 2012

Fingerprint

Uncertainty
Contrast Sensitivity
Transducers
Psychometrics
Noise
Research Design

Bibliographical note

Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License

Keywords

  • summation
  • energy
  • contrast detection
  • integration
  • area
  • uncertainty
  • theory

Cite this

@article{07287dfce8ab44f281297cf69e167d8e,
title = "Theory and data for area summation of contrast with and without uncertainty: evidence for a noisy energy model",
abstract = "Contrast sensitivity improves with the area of a sine-wave grating, but why? Here we assess this phenomenon against contemporary models involving spatial summation, probability summation, uncertainty, and stochastic noise. Using a two-interval forced-choice procedure we measured contrast sensitivity for circular patches of sine-wave gratings with various diameters that were blocked or interleaved across trials to produce low and high extrinsic uncertainty, respectively. Summation curves were steep initially, becoming shallower thereafter. For the smaller stimuli, sensitivity was slightly worse for the interleaved design than for the blocked design. Neither area nor blocking affected the slope of the psychometric function. We derived model predictions for noisy mechanisms and extrinsic uncertainty that was either low or high. The contrast transducer was either linear (c1.0) or nonlinear (c2.0), and pooling was either linear or a MAX operation. There was either no intrinsic uncertainty, or it was fixed or proportional to stimulus size. Of these 10 canonical models, only the nonlinear transducer with linear pooling (the noisy energy model) described the main forms of the data for both experimental designs. We also show how a cross-correlator can be modified to fit our results and provide a contemporary presentation of the relation between summation and the slope of the psychometric function.",
keywords = "summation , energy, contrast detection, integration, area, uncertainty, theory",
author = "Tim Meese and Robert Summers",
note = "Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1167/12.11.9",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "11",

}

Theory and data for area summation of contrast with and without uncertainty : evidence for a noisy energy model. / Meese, Tim; Summers, Robert.

In: Journal of Vision, Vol. 12, No. 11, 9, 17.10.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Theory and data for area summation of contrast with and without uncertainty

T2 - evidence for a noisy energy model

AU - Meese, Tim

AU - Summers, Robert

N1 - Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License

PY - 2012/10/17

Y1 - 2012/10/17

N2 - Contrast sensitivity improves with the area of a sine-wave grating, but why? Here we assess this phenomenon against contemporary models involving spatial summation, probability summation, uncertainty, and stochastic noise. Using a two-interval forced-choice procedure we measured contrast sensitivity for circular patches of sine-wave gratings with various diameters that were blocked or interleaved across trials to produce low and high extrinsic uncertainty, respectively. Summation curves were steep initially, becoming shallower thereafter. For the smaller stimuli, sensitivity was slightly worse for the interleaved design than for the blocked design. Neither area nor blocking affected the slope of the psychometric function. We derived model predictions for noisy mechanisms and extrinsic uncertainty that was either low or high. The contrast transducer was either linear (c1.0) or nonlinear (c2.0), and pooling was either linear or a MAX operation. There was either no intrinsic uncertainty, or it was fixed or proportional to stimulus size. Of these 10 canonical models, only the nonlinear transducer with linear pooling (the noisy energy model) described the main forms of the data for both experimental designs. We also show how a cross-correlator can be modified to fit our results and provide a contemporary presentation of the relation between summation and the slope of the psychometric function.

AB - Contrast sensitivity improves with the area of a sine-wave grating, but why? Here we assess this phenomenon against contemporary models involving spatial summation, probability summation, uncertainty, and stochastic noise. Using a two-interval forced-choice procedure we measured contrast sensitivity for circular patches of sine-wave gratings with various diameters that were blocked or interleaved across trials to produce low and high extrinsic uncertainty, respectively. Summation curves were steep initially, becoming shallower thereafter. For the smaller stimuli, sensitivity was slightly worse for the interleaved design than for the blocked design. Neither area nor blocking affected the slope of the psychometric function. We derived model predictions for noisy mechanisms and extrinsic uncertainty that was either low or high. The contrast transducer was either linear (c1.0) or nonlinear (c2.0), and pooling was either linear or a MAX operation. There was either no intrinsic uncertainty, or it was fixed or proportional to stimulus size. Of these 10 canonical models, only the nonlinear transducer with linear pooling (the noisy energy model) described the main forms of the data for both experimental designs. We also show how a cross-correlator can be modified to fit our results and provide a contemporary presentation of the relation between summation and the slope of the psychometric function.

KW - summation

KW - energy

KW - contrast detection

KW - integration

KW - area

KW - uncertainty

KW - theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870280773&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.journalofvision.org/content/12/11/9.abstract

U2 - 10.1167/12.11.9

DO - 10.1167/12.11.9

M3 - Article

VL - 12

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 11

M1 - 9

ER -