What drives the prediction of early reading? An analysis of stimulus and response-type

Anna Cunningham, Laura Shapiro, Caroline Witton, Joel Talcott, Adrian Burgess, Kate Swoboda

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

Purpose: Phonological accounts of reading implicate three aspects of phonological awareness tasks that underlie the relationship with reading; a) the language-based nature of the stimuli (words or nonwords), b) the verbal nature of the response, and c) the complexity of the stimuli (words can be segmented into units of speech). Yet, it is uncertain which task characteristics are most important as they are typically confounded. By systematically varying response-type and stimulus complexity across speech and non-speech stimuli, the current study seeks to isolate the characteristics of phonological awareness tasks that drive the prediction of early reading. Method: Four sets of tasks were created; tone stimuli (simple non-speech) requiring a non-verbal response, phonemes (simple speech) requiring a non-verbal response, phonemes requiring a verbal response, and nonwords (complex speech) requiring a verbal response. Tasks were administered to 570 2nd grade children along with standardized tests of reading and non-verbal IQ. Results: Three structural equation models comparing matched sets of tasks were built. Each model consisted of two 'task' factors with a direct link to a reading factor. The following factors predicted unique variance in reading: a) simple speech and non-speech stimuli, b) simple speech requiring a verbal response but not simple speech requiring a non-verbal-response, and c) complex and simple speech stimuli. Conclusions: Results suggest that the prediction of reading by phonological tasks is driven by the verbal nature of the response and not the complexity or 'speechness' of the stimuli. Findings highlight the importance of phonological output processes to early reading.
LanguageEnglish
Publication statusUnpublished - 2013
Event20th annual meeting Society for the Scientific Study of Reading - Hong Kong, China
Duration: 10 Jul 201313 Jul 2013

Meeting

Meeting20th annual meeting Society for the Scientific Study of Reading
CountryChina
CityHong Kong
Period10/07/1313/07/13

Fingerprint

Reading
Drive
Structural Models
Language

Cite this

Cunningham, A., Shapiro, L., Witton, C., Talcott, J., Burgess, A., & Swoboda, K. (2013). What drives the prediction of early reading? An analysis of stimulus and response-type. Paper presented at 20th annual meeting Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Hong Kong, China.
Cunningham, Anna ; Shapiro, Laura ; Witton, Caroline ; Talcott, Joel ; Burgess, Adrian ; Swoboda, Kate. / What drives the prediction of early reading? An analysis of stimulus and response-type. Paper presented at 20th annual meeting Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Hong Kong, China.
@conference{e586b6ab89a543a2b30100adeea629a2,
title = "What drives the prediction of early reading? An analysis of stimulus and response-type",
abstract = "Purpose: Phonological accounts of reading implicate three aspects of phonological awareness tasks that underlie the relationship with reading; a) the language-based nature of the stimuli (words or nonwords), b) the verbal nature of the response, and c) the complexity of the stimuli (words can be segmented into units of speech). Yet, it is uncertain which task characteristics are most important as they are typically confounded. By systematically varying response-type and stimulus complexity across speech and non-speech stimuli, the current study seeks to isolate the characteristics of phonological awareness tasks that drive the prediction of early reading. Method: Four sets of tasks were created; tone stimuli (simple non-speech) requiring a non-verbal response, phonemes (simple speech) requiring a non-verbal response, phonemes requiring a verbal response, and nonwords (complex speech) requiring a verbal response. Tasks were administered to 570 2nd grade children along with standardized tests of reading and non-verbal IQ. Results: Three structural equation models comparing matched sets of tasks were built. Each model consisted of two 'task' factors with a direct link to a reading factor. The following factors predicted unique variance in reading: a) simple speech and non-speech stimuli, b) simple speech requiring a verbal response but not simple speech requiring a non-verbal-response, and c) complex and simple speech stimuli. Conclusions: Results suggest that the prediction of reading by phonological tasks is driven by the verbal nature of the response and not the complexity or 'speechness' of the stimuli. Findings highlight the importance of phonological output processes to early reading.",
author = "Anna Cunningham and Laura Shapiro and Caroline Witton and Joel Talcott and Adrian Burgess and Kate Swoboda",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
note = "20th annual meeting Society for the Scientific Study of Reading ; Conference date: 10-07-2013 Through 13-07-2013",

}

Cunningham, A, Shapiro, L, Witton, C, Talcott, J, Burgess, A & Swoboda, K 2013, 'What drives the prediction of early reading? An analysis of stimulus and response-type' Paper presented at 20th annual meeting Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Hong Kong, China, 10/07/13 - 13/07/13, .

What drives the prediction of early reading? An analysis of stimulus and response-type. / Cunningham, Anna; Shapiro, Laura; Witton, Caroline; Talcott, Joel; Burgess, Adrian; Swoboda, Kate.

2013. Paper presented at 20th annual meeting Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Hong Kong, China.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - What drives the prediction of early reading? An analysis of stimulus and response-type

AU - Cunningham, Anna

AU - Shapiro, Laura

AU - Witton, Caroline

AU - Talcott, Joel

AU - Burgess, Adrian

AU - Swoboda, Kate

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Purpose: Phonological accounts of reading implicate three aspects of phonological awareness tasks that underlie the relationship with reading; a) the language-based nature of the stimuli (words or nonwords), b) the verbal nature of the response, and c) the complexity of the stimuli (words can be segmented into units of speech). Yet, it is uncertain which task characteristics are most important as they are typically confounded. By systematically varying response-type and stimulus complexity across speech and non-speech stimuli, the current study seeks to isolate the characteristics of phonological awareness tasks that drive the prediction of early reading. Method: Four sets of tasks were created; tone stimuli (simple non-speech) requiring a non-verbal response, phonemes (simple speech) requiring a non-verbal response, phonemes requiring a verbal response, and nonwords (complex speech) requiring a verbal response. Tasks were administered to 570 2nd grade children along with standardized tests of reading and non-verbal IQ. Results: Three structural equation models comparing matched sets of tasks were built. Each model consisted of two 'task' factors with a direct link to a reading factor. The following factors predicted unique variance in reading: a) simple speech and non-speech stimuli, b) simple speech requiring a verbal response but not simple speech requiring a non-verbal-response, and c) complex and simple speech stimuli. Conclusions: Results suggest that the prediction of reading by phonological tasks is driven by the verbal nature of the response and not the complexity or 'speechness' of the stimuli. Findings highlight the importance of phonological output processes to early reading.

AB - Purpose: Phonological accounts of reading implicate three aspects of phonological awareness tasks that underlie the relationship with reading; a) the language-based nature of the stimuli (words or nonwords), b) the verbal nature of the response, and c) the complexity of the stimuli (words can be segmented into units of speech). Yet, it is uncertain which task characteristics are most important as they are typically confounded. By systematically varying response-type and stimulus complexity across speech and non-speech stimuli, the current study seeks to isolate the characteristics of phonological awareness tasks that drive the prediction of early reading. Method: Four sets of tasks were created; tone stimuli (simple non-speech) requiring a non-verbal response, phonemes (simple speech) requiring a non-verbal response, phonemes requiring a verbal response, and nonwords (complex speech) requiring a verbal response. Tasks were administered to 570 2nd grade children along with standardized tests of reading and non-verbal IQ. Results: Three structural equation models comparing matched sets of tasks were built. Each model consisted of two 'task' factors with a direct link to a reading factor. The following factors predicted unique variance in reading: a) simple speech and non-speech stimuli, b) simple speech requiring a verbal response but not simple speech requiring a non-verbal-response, and c) complex and simple speech stimuli. Conclusions: Results suggest that the prediction of reading by phonological tasks is driven by the verbal nature of the response and not the complexity or 'speechness' of the stimuli. Findings highlight the importance of phonological output processes to early reading.

M3 - Paper

ER -

Cunningham A, Shapiro L, Witton C, Talcott J, Burgess A, Swoboda K. What drives the prediction of early reading? An analysis of stimulus and response-type. 2013. Paper presented at 20th annual meeting Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Hong Kong, China.