TY - JOUR
T1 - New career models in UK professional service firms
T2 - from up-or-out to up-and-going-nowhere?
AU - Malhotra, Namrata
AU - Morris, Tim
AU - Smets, Michael
N1 - This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article published in Malhotra, N., Morris, T., & Smets, M. (2010). New career models in UK professional service firms: from up-or-out to up-and-going-nowhere? International journal of human resource management, 21(9), 1396-1413. International journal of human resource management © 2010 Taylor & Francis, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09585192.2010.488436
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - In this paper, we empirically examine how professional service firms are adapting their promotion and career models to new market and institutional pressures, without losing the benefits of the traditional up-or-out tournament. Based on an in-depth qualitative study of 10 large UK based law firms we find that most of these firms do not have a formal up-or-out policy but that the up-or-out rule operates in practice. We also find that most firms have introduced alternative roles and a novel career policy that offers a holistic learning and development deal to associates without any expectation that unsuccessful candidates for promotion to partner should quit the firm. While this policy and the new roles formally contradict the principle of up-or-out by creating permanent non-partner positions, in practice they coexist. We conclude that the motivational power of the up-or-out tournament remains intact, notwithstanding the changes to the internal labour market structure of these professional service firms.
AB - In this paper, we empirically examine how professional service firms are adapting their promotion and career models to new market and institutional pressures, without losing the benefits of the traditional up-or-out tournament. Based on an in-depth qualitative study of 10 large UK based law firms we find that most of these firms do not have a formal up-or-out policy but that the up-or-out rule operates in practice. We also find that most firms have introduced alternative roles and a novel career policy that offers a holistic learning and development deal to associates without any expectation that unsuccessful candidates for promotion to partner should quit the firm. While this policy and the new roles formally contradict the principle of up-or-out by creating permanent non-partner positions, in practice they coexist. We conclude that the motivational power of the up-or-out tournament remains intact, notwithstanding the changes to the internal labour market structure of these professional service firms.
KW - careers
KW - tournament theory
KW - professional services
KW - law
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954421741&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09585192.2010.488436
DO - 10.1080/09585192.2010.488436
M3 - Article
SN - 0958-5192
VL - 21
SP - 1396
EP - 1413
JO - International Journal of Human Resource Management
JF - International Journal of Human Resource Management
IS - 9
ER -